So, I can't stop thinking of this.
1. Not ONE Islamic country has benefited from the radicalisation of Islam. Not ONE.
2. In each case, radicalisation was enforced, not by the majority, but by a small, well-armed, and well-funded group, which then went on to use armed occupation to enforce radicalisation. (Turkey is an exception)
So:
A. Who was paying? How were they well-armed and well-funded?
B. Who is benefitting?
A. Who was paying? How were they well-armed and well-funded?
B. Who is benefitting?
No comments:
Post a Comment